Wednesday, April 6, 2016

PB1B


   The research paper I looked at talked about wireless sensor networks(WSN), which are freely-spaced sensors with the task to cooperatively transfer their data through the network to a specific location. It addressed the issue that these sensors face in network congestion, which is reduced quality of service that happens when a network node(point of intersection or connection)carries more data than it is capable of. The paper immediately begins to introduce higher-level terminology and explains what they mean. For example, context-free grammar-as described in the text-is a set of writing rules that "embodies the theoretical principles of programming languages." This is important to do because introducing terms that may seem new to some readers can draw away interest from the text.

   One writing convention evidently seen in this paper is a problem and a potential solution to this problem that is put to test. This paper argues that "few analysts would disagree with the deployment of context-free grammar." In order to solve this issue, they used multimodal models to show that write-ahead logging and simulated annealing(technique used to compute the global optimum of a given function) can help overcome this problem.
 
    The writing and representation of the text itself is another key convention to research papers. Within this research paper are the clearly labeled sections that contain discussions of the problem. It offers a numbered outline with an introduction, supporting body paragraphs, and a conclusion analyzing the results from the experiment. Following the results, are the ways in which these results are helpful(or not) in solving this previously stated issue. Other things that follow are an explanation of the ways in which the model can be improved. Another important factor is a step-by-step explanation of the experiment and its design(shown through visual representations) to better help familiarize the reader. The text is split into six categories. Some headings, such as the title, are made larger and bolder to emphasize the question being asked or the experiment being put to test.

   Research papers also include qualitative and quantitative research. Qualitative research refers to the process in which you ask questions and come up with procedures, collect data, analyze that data, make inferences based off of one's own generalizations in a particular instance, as well the interpret what the data means and how it affects the outcome of the experiment. Quantitative research refers to the way in which one tests a theory through the examination of the relationship among variables in the experiment. The results obtained from such practice can then be used to create statistical representations of the results such as graphs. An example of this is seen the section Architecture where they "assume that Smalltalk can be made classical, extensible, and concurrent...We use our previously deployed results as a basis for all of these assumptions." Because of results previously obtained, they are able to make assumptions about other future results even though the variables in the experiment are subject to change. Making inferences is important in this textual genre because an essential part to experiments is being able to deduce from ones learning.
 
   Lastly, this text uses scholarly references relating to the subject being addressed in order to create validity. When a writer includes adequate resources, it helps build their case.





4 comments:

  1. Your analysis of the Research paper was very very precise and in-depth. I like how you talked about and referenced the specific content of the paper and then generalized those pieces of evidence in order to depict them as rhetorical features that might make up that of a research paper. The only thing I thought that was missing was the other genre generators and the ending commentary that generalizes how we have been thinking about genre. I think that last portion of commentary is really cool in this assignment because it allows us to go beyond one specific genre and think about the ways genre interacts with our daily lives in more than just writing and literature.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ayala,

    Your annual summer-at-the-family-farm-in-Mexico sounds like an extremely cool experience. I wish I had something going on like that.

    Your PB1A on billboards—specifically ChickFilA billboards—was very strong. The examples that you posted—in addition to specific slices of languages that you pulled out to analyze—helped me to SEE (and think about) what you wanted me to see. You supported your claims that these examples were humorous and contained simplified language. I love how you brought “exigence” into the mix. To explore your analysis even further, you could consider questions like: OK, how/why are these billboards place in the ways that they have been? (Seems obvious, but there might be a lot going on there.) If billboard are a form of advertisement, how do billboards compare to other ads? What affordances/constraints can you dig into?

    Re: your PB1B, what happened to your analysis of the Pandyland comic, memes, and another genre generator that you found? The more practice you get with genres—and specifically, how conventions can be randomly generated, and what impact this has on the overall piece—can help you dig into genres+conventions even further.

    In Writing 2, we’re trying to train you to become super-observant so that you can get down to the nittiest of details and adhere (if that’s what you want to do) to the audience’s expectations. Despite overlooking some of the PB1B reqs, it looks like you’re still well on our way. By gaining a deeper and more critical reading awareness, you’ll be able to adopt/adapt writer’s choices (their writing) into your own writing—we’re not quite there yet (that’s WP2!), but we’ve got a good start.

    Z

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Great analysis on research papers. I think you did a very thorough job in differentiating different types of research papers and their conventions. You also did a great job in mentioning all the convention of your research paper example. However, I think you could have dugged deeper in how the coventions of the research paper example you generated, differs from other types of research papers. Also, I did not see any other types of genres discussed in your PB1B.

      Delete
    2. Great analysis on research papers. I think you did a very thorough job in differentiating different types of research papers and their conventions. You also did a great job in mentioning all the convention of your research paper example. However, I think you could have dugged deeper in how the coventions of the research paper example you generated, differs from other types of research papers. Also, I did not see any other types of genres discussed in your PB1B.

      Delete